Amber Heard convinced key evidence may have changed verdict in defamation case against Johnny Depp

Amber Heard is convinced a key piece of evidence could have triggered a different outcome in her defamation trial against Johnny Depp.

On a preview of the ‘Aquaman’ actress’ interview with Savannah Guthrie that is part of a Dateline special set to air on Friday night (18.06.22) on NBC, Heard is asked if there is “one piece of evidence that you wish the jury had seen that you could point to and say, ‘Ah! This would have made a difference’.”

Heard, 36, responds: “Yes”, before Guthrie asks: “What is it?”

She added: “There’s a binder worth of years of notes dating back to 2011 from the very beginning of my relationship that were taken by my doctor who I was reporting the abuse to.”

Guthrie, 50, stressed ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ actor Depp’s legal team refuted her abuse claims and said not one woman came forward alleging they were hit by the 58-year-old star.

Heard said: “Look what happened to me when I came forward. Would you?”

People are also reading…

Dateline is airing the full interview at 8pm EST.

Heard previously told Guthrie she doesn’t have hard feelings against Depp despite losing the defamation case earlier this month.

She said of Depp, from whom she divorced in 2016: “I love him. I loved him with all my heart. “I tried my best to make a deeply broken relationship work. I have no bad feelings or ill will toward him at all.”

The couple’s bitter six-week trial began a around three years after Depp filed a $50 million defamation lawsuit against Heard in March 2019 following a newspaper article she wrote that detailed how she was the victim of domestic violence.

Depp won when a jury at Fairfax County Courthouse, Virginia, unanimously sided with him and awarded him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages.

Heard was awarded $2 million by the jury in compensatory damages for her counterclaim but nothing in punitive damages.

Heard admitted to Guthrie she knows she wasn’t a “likeable” or “perfect” alleged victim.

She said: “When I testified, I asked the jury to just see me as human,” she explained.

“I took for granted what I assumed was my right to speak.

“I’m scared that no matter what I do, no matter what I say, or how I say it, every step that I take will present another opportunity for this, sort of, silencing.”

Stay connected with us on social media platform for instant update click here to join our  Twitter, & Facebook

We are now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@TechiUpdate) and stay updated with the latest Technology headlines.

For all the latest Entertainment News Click Here 

 For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.