Turnbull defends $6m ‘gift’ to children in name of ‘transparency’

Malcolm Turnbull says he gave $6 million to his children to manage a loan for shares in a Sydney fund manager to simplify his investment portfolio and reduce conflicts of interests before becoming prime minister.

Mr Turnbull told the NSW Supreme Court on Tuesday he valued “transparency and accountability” and that’s why he “gifted” the money to his children to take over a loan for shares given to longstanding family friend and Pengana chief executive Russel Pillemer in 2008.

The lawsuit over whether Mr Pillemer later misled and deceived the Turnbulls which caused them to lose money has also raised allegations about Mr Turnbull’s son, Alex Turnbull, who has been accused of telling a “pack of lies” to suit his interests and “warehousing” his father’s shares.

Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has been forced to defend his decision to “gift” $6 million to his adult children.Credit:Wolter Peeters

When asked why Mr Turnbull gave his children the money, he responded: “They did not have to reach into their own pocket to pay for the loan, they were given a gift by their parents. Parents often give gifts to their children.”

Lawyers for Mr Pillemer said Mr Turnbull’s political dealings were not a focus of the case, but that “gifting” the money to his children allowed him to avoid having to report his exposure to Pengana on public registers and reduced scrutiny from the federal opposition and financial press.

“Rightly or wrongly, fairly or unfairly, there is a problem being a minister of the Crown, on the one hand, and at the same time having exposure to investments which might be effected by political decisions,” Robert Newlinds SC said.

Mr Turnbull said conflicts of interest are “managed all the time” and his son was better able to control parts of his investment portfolio because he had more time and worked in the financial services industry. “As a minister in the government, you are very busy, you simply do not have the time to manage your own investments,” he said. “I am very committed to disclosure and transparency. That’s why I did not use a blind trust.”

At the heart of the case is whether the company Maurtray, owned by Alex Turnbull and his sister Daisy Turnbull, unfairly lost money by accepting cash for repayment of the 2008 loan rather than taking Pengana shares and selling them on the market for a higher price.

Alex Turnbull claims he was not made aware of Pengana’s plans to merge with Hunter Hall in 2017, which significantly pushed up the stock value of the group, and is now suing for damages of up to $12 million.

Stay connected with us on social media platform for instant update click here to join our  Twitter, & Facebook

We are now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@TechiUpdate) and stay updated with the latest Technology headlines.

For all the latest Education News Click Here 

 For the latest news and updates, follow us on Google News

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! TechiLive.in is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.